Subaru of America says the new car limited warranty "requires the vehicle must be presented to an authorized Subaru retailer for warranty repairs."Īlso, the N.J. The Judge dismissed the plaintiff's breach of express warranty and implied warranty claims.įive breaches of express warranty claims are dismissed because plaintiffs didn't bring their vehicles to Subaru for windshield repairs. But the Court did dismiss some claims against Subaru. automaker's motion for a more definitive statement is denied. In the new ruling, Judge Noel Hillman will not dismiss the defective windshield lawsuit against Subaru, and the Camden, N.J. In March, Subaru asked the Court to dismiss the case stating the plaintiffs have never owned the model years they say have the same defective windshields. Torque News reported in February the lawsuit added 15 new plaintiffs to the case. Christine Powell, represented by Attorneys Carlson Lynch, LeVan Law Group, Moon Law APC, and Freed Kanner London & Millen, contends the Subaru models have "defective and dangerous" windshields that are prone to "cracking, chipping and otherwise breaking." covering the Subaru models listed above.Īccording to records obtained from Justia US Law, a court ruling has also granted in part and denied in part Subaru of America's motion to dismiss.
In November, Torque News reported the defective windshield class-action lawsuit against Subaru of America included 2.5 million vehicles in the U.S. New information in the Subaru defective windshield lawsuit covers the 2017-2020 Subaru Forester, Outback, Crosstrek, Impreza, Legacy, and 2019-2020 Subaru Ascent models.
0 kommentar(er)
